Archive for May, 2007

New Media

I’m an avid listner of The Ozone Nightmare, a regular podcast on all sorts of things by two regular nerds, Joe & Lando.

On Saturday, 12th May they ran the show, ‘Forced Perspective‘.

This week Lando and I are discussing the disturbing increase in people who are losing their perspective on the things that matter. Nitpicking on party affiliation instead of working to fix the problems in Iraq, sitting and back and relaxing without holding governments accountable, choosing sensationalism rather than truly hard news…there are times where we seem to want someone else to just take care of the big issues, ignore them in favor of assigning blame, or we simply can’t seem to focus on what they are. And what’s with that silly Electoral College anyway

After reading the following comments, I felt compelled to offer my own thoughts.

Most of my mates in Australia see the American Army as a bunch of ‘Trailer park trash’ that have no alternative other than join the army due to your lack of welfare system. Australia also sees America as a bunch of uncaring individuals were money takes precedent over the community. They treat their poor with contempt and as a burden especially with the recent and ongoing treatment of the blacks in the Mississippi floods etc. America should be ashamed at its minimum wage, lack of health care, imperialism war state like aggression and corporate greed. Unfortunately Australia is following your lead…I know this is a very broad overview but like you feel like the little people like us mean nothing anymore. I agree that political parties are no longer run by the working man but just puppets manipulated by bigger fish… If the Environment survives their is hope :)

posted by: Carl on Tue, 5/15 06:49 PM EDT

You mean I could have stayed with mama in her trailer and drank Fosters all day instead of keep those Godless East German Communists Bastards of the Warsaw Pact at arms length from the Free World? If only I’d been born in Oz.

“Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin

posted by: darwingodwin on Thu, 5/17 09:46 AM EDT

Hahaha, classic. I think the above effectively pinpoints the ignorance of Carl’s remark. It should be obvious that anyone who would so readily generalize stereotypes to a whole nation is NOT, speaking for ‘all his mates.’

I think most people would be genuinely surprised how much in common they had with their counterparts in countries all around the world that are selectively vilified, manipulated and ‘filtered’ by the media and the elites with whom we share the least common ground except geographic location.

This is why it is so refreshing to hear some ordinary Americans speak passionately against the administration that (purportedly) represents your country. You only have to look at the polls to see that you’re not in the minority. If only this was the case before the war. Of course there was public opposition before the war here in Australia but not enough of it, and like John Kerry due to ineffectual political opposition we voted back in our Prime Minister in 2004.

So the elites takes our countries to war and misrepresent their people with the power of a manipulated media. Why wasn’t there enough opposition in the US or Australia or the UK? Because people got sucked into believing this was the same fight as Afghanistan. That this war was a continuation of helping defend our allies after the unprovoked attacks of September 11. People still don’t really appreciate the difference, because as support for Iraq drops, so does support for Afghanistan. Hell can anyone point to a mainstream source that published the offers that Saddam Hussein was willing to negotiate, including the “unconditional return of UN weapons inspectors”?

Perhaps a point of difference in Australia is the word ‘patriotism’. It has nothing like the kind of resonance it has in the US, we don’t adorn ourselves or our buildings in the Australian flag and our mythologizing of our armed services is limited to the bravery shown by the ANZACs (who were ordered to die by their superiors). Our force is too small to even consider things like ‘military families’ or much of a military culture and no public figure as far as I’m aware has used the ‘support the troops’ line. Our country’s ethos could never be “we’re the greatest nation on Earth”, if anything our national character attempts to be humble and suspicious of those in authority but supportive of our friends/mates no matter what. At least that’s what it says on the coffee mugs in the tourist shop.

Perhaps ordinary opinions by ordinary people can help breach these filters imposed on us, and people will see something more worthwhile than that laughable ‘objectivity’ of the mainstream media in podcasts and blogs such as yours.

, , , , ,

Remix My Life (Part One)

Remix My Life

One of a two parts, an epic string symphony mutates into a trance finale.

Vocal samples: Cybersutra Suite by Heppe

Listen @ ccMixter

Listen @ MakeTunes

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License.

, , ,

++good: Work Choices ‘aint Work Choices

Censorship
Photo by scol22

It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.

Chapter 5, Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell

It was with similar incredulity that I discovered that the Australian government intends to ‘rename’ it’s controversial Work Choices legislation. As though it had been thrust into a ‘memory hole’, Work Choices has been purged from government vocabulary:

THE term “Work Choices” has been officially banished from the vocabulary of staff employed to provide the public with information about the government’s controversial workplace laws.
In a sign of the unpopularity of the laws, government newspaper ads on industrial relations issues no longer refer to the term “Work Choices.”
Staff on a Department of Workplace Relations information line have been told to stop using the term “Work Choices.”

The department’s website now refers to the “Work Choices Infoline” as the “Workplace Infoline” and posters tell call centre staff “all references to Work Choices should now be changed to workplace relations”.

“If a client is confused because of the new name, you should indicate they have called the correct number and clarify that our name has changed to make it easier for people to get information,” a guide for operators says.

“In all instances a client should be referred to the workplace website, not to the Work Choices website.”

The changes come after internal Labor Party polling showed strong support for the party’s opposition to Work Choices.

 This may be a case of newspeak backlash. That is, the government overreached when attempting to brand its unfair and cutthroat legislation as being about freedom and choice by labeling it “Work Choices”. The brand is so obviously an application of newspeak (thanks in part to an effective ACTU campaign) that the irony is almost explicit and reinforces the view that the whole legislation stinks.

Only in this world of the post-modern where everything is a simulacrum, and there is no noumenon, ding an sich or reality behind the world of phenomena could a ‘coalition figure‘ look at the public reaction to Work Choices and conclude:

“It’s not a popular word”.

But John Howard has never been one to sway with the breeze of populism has he?

Petrol excise, Medicare safety-net, David Hicks, now Work Choices. John Howard is a master at successfully defusing unpopular election year issues. This particular example demolishes his “I make tough choices even if they’re unpopular” persona.

Even if the statistics show that the legislation isn’t all it is cracked up to be, we have such a firm grasp on reality that we’ll  show you these other statistics that conform to our view.

 JULIA GILLARD: Now, if there’s a government cover-up…

JOE HOCKEY: That’s just wrong.

JULIA GILLARD: …of statistics, that’s because they know the outcome of those statistics…

JOE HOCKEY: That’s just wrong.

JULIA GILLARD: …if it was public view would tell an unpleasant truth for them.

ELEANOR HALL: Well Minister, if WorkChoices is so resoundingly positive, why are refusing to release the latest figures on how Australian Workplace Agreements are operating?

JOE HOCKEY: Can I tell you what the best indicator of the performance of our workplace laws is? The statistics that are released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the independent bureau that says that wages are up 1.5 per cent in real terms over the last 12 months, that 263,000 new jobs are being created, nearly 90 per cent of those jobs are full-time, and the fact that industrial disputation is at it’s lowest level since records were first kept in 1913.

ELEANOR HALL: These are all very general statistics.

JOE HOCKEY: Now they’re the best statistics…

… 

JULIA GILLARD: What the ABS told us, the independent authority Joe has just referred to, is if you compare the earnings of men on AWAs compared with men on collective agreements, the men on AWAs earn less.

JOE HOCKEY: That’s not right, that’s actually factually not right.

JULIA GILLARD: And if you compare the earnings of women on AWAs compared with women on collective agreements, women do spectacularly worse.

JOE HOCKEY: That’s wrong too.

JULIA GILLARD: Full-time women up to $85 a week worse off, and we know that the gender gap in pay is increasing. They are all published ABS statistics, not capable of being denied.

Reality is just a ‘point of view’ after all, and tha’t s just actually factually right Joe.

As repugnant, manipulative and idiotic as this rebranding exercise sounds I could hardly believe my ears when I heard the following from the Employment and Workplace Relations minister Joe Hockey:

Mr Hockey says the recently reintroduced fairness test changed the system, so it’s not really WorkChoices any more.

From the SBS World News Transcript 2007-05-17 (LABOR FLEXIBLE ON AWAs)

The fairness test is designed to make sure employers ‘adequately’ compensate employees when signing an AWA and trading away things like penalty rates.

In a doorstop interview on the 25th of March, Howard used the linguistic subtlety of ‘fine tuning’, which means you can change something and still claim you haven’t altered any of the “fundametnals”. He was asked: “When is the fine tuning coming up?”

PRIME MINISTER:

Well it has already occurred. But don’t read into that what I think from your question you are trying to read into it. We’re not going to be making any changes of substance to WorkChoices because we believe WorkChoices is a very good policy.

As of 25/03/07, “Look I have said all along that the Government is willing to fine-tune, but we are not going to alter any of the fundamentals. There will be no change in that position.” 

As of 16/04/07, “We’re not going to change the fundamentals of that policy, I’ve said from day one that if any fine tuning were necessary it would occur but nothing has changed in relation to Work Choices”

As of 04/05/07, “I believe that with legislation as big and as important as this, you do need to monitor its operation. I always said we would be willing to fine-tune it”.

As of 04/05/07, (in the same breath!) the fairness test “is a bit more than fine-tuning, but it doesn’t undermine in any way the fundamentals of the legislation and it’s a sensible change”.

As of 17/05/07 , the “fairness test changed the system, so it’s not really Work Choices any more“.

Australia is at war with Eurasia, Australia has always been at war with Eurasia.

The first four quotes are from John Howard, the last from Joe Hockey. This may be another case of miscommunication between the boss and the minister. However, renaming two of the administering bodies on the same day you tinker with/fundamentally alter the legislation leaves the odour of ‘orchestration’ not miscommunication. Previously, and perhaps ironically Hockey signaled that changes may be made to the Work Choices legislation before the election in seeming contradiction to Howard’s stance that “this lady’s not for turning.”

Perhaps now, as then, Hockey is committing the cardinal sin of politics: being honest. Michelle Grattan argues that this fariness test “is a fundametnal change” and that,

For Howard, this was a big swallow. He had consistently said that while he was willing to tinker around the edges, he would never alter the basics.

… 

“No change” went the way of that “never ever” promise on the GST.

It is with perhaps the same over-reaching newspeak that the addition of the ‘fairness test’, will remind the voters that the legislation wasn’t fair and still isn’t.

Sorry Big Brother, I don’t care what name you put on the wrapper, that still isn’t chocolate under there and I ‘aint swallowing it.

, , , , ,

Creative Commons Collaboration

So here’s how Creative Commons works:

Goto:
http://creativecommons.org/license/

and select your license. Mine is thise one:
Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported

This means you are free to download my music give it to your friends whatever, and you can remix and make derivative works, but cannot use those works for commerical purposes, in other words profit from those works.

So if someone makes it big with a remix of one of your tracks, you can waive the restrictions and negotiate a new agreement for commercial use.

A similar licence is the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported which is exactly the same except:

“Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.”

I think this spirit is at the core of the maketunes community, it would be a good idea to integrate the music upload proccess with the ability to choose a CC license. And it should probably be restricted to at least Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported, which means it’s legal to download and share the music.

There are also sampling licenses:

http://creativecommons.org/about/sampling
http://creativecommons.org/about/sampling-movie

But you only have to worry about using these if you are already selling your music.

The people at CC are all about explaining stuff in simple terms, here is a great page to understand it all:

http://creativecommons.org/learnmore/

I especially recommend the videos:
http://support.creativecommons.org/videos

, , , ,

Get your Music Heard: Make Tunes!

www.maketunes.com

MakeTunes is an online resource dedicated to music production in a home recording studio - for home musicians and producers, right through to professional recording studio hints and tips. Get feedback from the MakeTunes community on your tracks - upload your original music. Or compare Home Studio photos - upload your home studio, music gear or event photos today! Also featuring guides on music production and other home studio and home recording articles, and loops and samples.

Upload all of your tracks up to 10mb each and get awesome feedback from a tight community. You can also share the knowledge, engage in collaborations and more.

I’ve been a member for over two months and can safely assert that this is the best music community I’ve had the pleasure of being involved with.

, , ,

Free MySpace Promotion -A Loud Silent Machine

Club Electronica - Join The Movement

Great new group designed to let artists help promote each other.

The Loud Silent Machine
http://groups.myspace.com/aloudsilentmachine

The Loud Silent Machine isn’t just a group for music fans; it’s a group for music activists. People, who live, eat, drink, and sleep music. And are willing to donate their time, energy and internet, to help advertise, and promote new artists. I myself am a artist as well as a fan; I created this group with the central idea of helping artists reach fans on a different level. The word fan, is short for fanatic, the Encarta dictionary defines a fanatic as someone who has “extreme and sometimes irrational enthusiasms or beliefs.”

People who love music are not fanatics, but music activists. Activists who recognize music as more than just entertainment, but as a celestrial experience in one’s existence. By joining this group, you have joined a collective of individuals who believe and promote this theme.

HOW TO GET YOUR MUSIC PLAYED IN THIS GROUP

Every week I will be looking for new artists to spotlight in the group. If you wish to be considered just email me expressing your interest, and we’ll take it from there. The artist or band that I choose to spotlight for the week, will have their song play as the opening song for the page, and any pictures or album covers will be posted on the groups main page.

I’m a member at the Electronica sub-group
http://groups.myspace.com/CLUBELECTRONICA

, , , ,

Check Out: Cybster DJ

A belated shout-out and much respect to Cybster DJ.

Cybster DJ

Cybster DJ is a Disk Jockey who started out spinning discs in skating rinks back in the 80’s. His vast experience entertaining the crowds includes Skating Rinks, School Discos, Parties, Raves, Weddings, Anniversary Parties, Corporate Functions, Concert Fillers, Festivals and more recently, Podcast production, internet radio and virtual world (Second Life) DJing.

Cybster DJ is an Australian with a rich calm tone and often plays on his Aussie accent and sense of humour to keep the punters entertained.

I have had the privellege of having one of my tracks, “Rara Avis” featured in one of his mixes: Episode #38

Digg it?

Check em all out: http://cybsterspace.com/

, , , ,

Check Out: ‘Clean Break’

Clean Break by Sole

Master music specialist, Sole took a short sample of mine “thick beat“, ‘vocalized’ it and turned it into a thumpin vocal trance song titled ‘Clean Break’.

, ,

Check out: Here Come Da Drums (P!t Version by P!tbull)

Here Come Da Drums (P!t Version by P!tbull)

The prolific musician P!tbull took my short sample “here come da drums” and turned it into an epic soundtrack. With powerful choirs and great production, he’s raised the bar a notch! :smile:

, , , , ,

Don’t Squash your tracks!

http://georgegraham.com/compress.html

A plea from a recording engineer not to SQUASH your tracks!
This is just as relevant as we are well and truly within the MP3 age. There is no reason os over-compress your music.

Now, with the CD, we have more than 90 db of dynamic range to utilize, and no surface noise or risk of groove skip to worry about. So what has become of all that wonderful dynamic range? The loudness wars have come back. While most classical CDs still make use of the CD’s dynamic range potential, once again the fallacious belief that “louder is better” has permeated the record industry.

One would think with the ability of the CD to deliver an accurate representation of the master tape, that mastering engineers would become an endangered species. However the skills of mastering engineers can be invaluable in taking a master that might consist of different songs recorded in different studios putting them together into a sonically consistent continuum. Also, experienced mastering engineers can “tweak” masters tapes to improve the sound to play well in a variety of listening situations.

Where the current pressure is coming from is unclear, but several prominent mastering engineers have complained that they are being pushed to make the CDs they work on as loud as possible. The digital audio medium also has its maximum upper limit in level, in this case all digital “ones.” So to make the music sounder louder more of the time, that means adding compression, just like the bad old days of 45s.

My CD player has a digital level display, and I am also able to take the digital output of a CD and run it into a computer editing system allowing statistical study of audio levels, and I am constantly appalled at how many CDs spent most of their time in the top 3-4 db of the 90 db available, with absolute digital maximum level being reached very frequently — sometimes on every beat. Sophisticated digital compressors alleviate the all the horrible distortion that would normally happen from hitting the digital “brick wall,” but nuances and the “airy” quality of the recording are murdered.

In the audio business, there is something of a chasm between broadcast audio engineers and recording engineers. Folks from one camp don’t seem to know a lot about the practices and mindset of the other. I guess I’m lucky to work on both sides of the fence — making music recordings for broadcast and then hearing just how they sound on the air. Every broadcast station already uses compression on the air. There is a legal limit, as regulated and monitored by the FCC, to the loudness of sound on the air. So to keep a signal loud enough not to be lost in fading, and static, compression, which varies by station and format, is inevitably used.

The fallacy that seems to have become pervasive among many people in the pop music recording field, especially among record companies, is that if a CD is pushing the absolute digital max it will somehow be louder or better on the air and presumably win more airplay, and thus sell more copies to the public. This is not true at all. Compressing a CD will contribute to on-air loudness almost unnoticeably. Radio people have the brains to turn up a CD that’s recorded at a normal level, and broadcast stations’ existing compressors will even everything out anyway. The only thing that is accomplished is messing up the dynamic range for those who pay their good money for CDs, “squashing” the life out of any acoustic instruments in the mix, and increasing listener fatigue.

Computer amok graphic Lately, this has been made worse by the increasing availablity of “desktop audio,” which puts powerful compression tools in the realm of the home studio, by using a computer to perform the mastering function. Increasing numbers of CDs are being released that have come from home and “project” studios, with generally less-experienced people doing the mixing and mastering in these settings. So some serious damage is being done by people impressed by how much louder they can make their recording sound by crushing the dynamic range with relatively inexpensive software.

Further, there is the phenomenon of “cascaded compression.” When an already-compressed signal (e.g. a CD) is itself compressed (e.g. when played on a radio station), the compressors can actually “fight” each other, one bringing down the signal, followed by another one with different characteristics that might want to bring it back up at a slightly different rate. The result can border on distortion, and gives an especially annoying “pumping” sound, that ruins what is left of the dynamics of the music and can leave the artist and producer’s sonic intent in shambles. And this is exactly the situation when a compressed CD is run on a radio station with its own compression.

Twenty five years of recording music for broadcast has led me to what seems like a heretical opinion these days: relatively uncompressed music recordings sound better on the air, and no less loud.

The CDs I mix try to preserve as much dynamic range as their genre calls for. And experience has shown that they will stand up to anything else, in terms of loudness on the air.

So in my own small way, I’ll add my voice to those in the professional audio business who are starting to complain about this sonic cheapening of music. With 20-bit bit-mapping technologies and ultimately the 24-bit potential of the DVD medium, the future dynamic range potential of CD is very bright. Why then, is the record business throwing away 95% of the potential of even today’s 16-bit technology in the loudness fallacy?

So in the hope someone takes notice, I’ll continue to complain whenever good music on CD is degraded by excessive compression

, ,




Close
E-mail It